Who we serve › Social casino
Payment processing for social casino operators: the web shop is the acquiring problem
TL;DR. Social casino sells coins with no cash-out, which keeps it out of the gambling category at the schemes and, in the US outside Washington and in the UK, at law; parts of Europe draw the line differently. For years that did not matter to payments, because the app stores were the merchant. Since the 2025 rulings opened external billing, operators are moving coin sales to their own web shops to recover the store commission, and a web shop is a merchant account: the operator becomes the merchant, needs an acquirer that underwrites the category, and inherits the fraud, the disputes and the state exposure the stores used to absorb. The acquirers that do this knowingly ask three things: proof of no cash-out, where the players are, and how disputes on virtual goods are handled. We prepare that file and place it.
Who this is for. Social casino and social gaming operators in the US and Europe processing $100K+ a month in coin sales, or about to, who are opening a web shop, adding a second acquirer, or being underwritten as gambling when they are not.
From the app store's merchant account to yours.
Inside the store
Apple or Google is the merchant: it bills the player, carries the dispute, applies its own fraud controls and takes its commission. The operator has no acquirer, no chargeback ratio and no state exposure at the payment layer.
The web shop
Since the May 2025 US rulings requiring Apple to permit external billing, and Google's expansion of third-party billing on Android, operators can sell coins on their own site. The commission comes back; so does everything the store was doing.
What that means
A merchant account in the category, coded as digital goods, underwritten on no-cash-out proof, player geography and dispute handling. The ratio is now yours, under Visa's and Mastercard's monitoring. The first acquirer should not be the first one that said yes.
General patterns, not rules: individual acquirers are more flexible than the category suggests, which is exactly what we know and they do not advertise. Which markets and states to serve, and how the product is structured, is for your counsel.
Four patterns we see in social casino files.
01
Underwritten as gambling.
The word casino, and a provider that did not read past it. The operator is coded 7995, priced and reserved for a category it is not in, and placed with acquirers that board gambling rather than digital goods. Say no cash-out on page one and prove it.
02
Disputes on virtual goods, handled like physical ones.
Digital items are delivered instantly, which leaves little evidence against an “unauthorised” claim, and disputes in gaming often come from young players' parents on shared family payment methods, as Stripe's own guidance on gaming fraud puts it. Clear descriptors, purchase confirmations, velocity monitoring, AVS/CVV and risk-based 3DS, and a refund-before-dispute policy are the controls; pre-dispute tools pay for themselves here.
03
State exposure discovered by the acquirer.
Washington is blocked in the terms and not at the payment page. The acquirer sees the state in the data before you do. Enforce the exclusions your counsel sets at registration and purchase, and show the acquirer how.
04
One acquirer for the whole web shop.
The store was redundancy you did not know you had. A single acquirer on the web shop is a single risk decision between the operator and all of its direct revenue. A second acquirer carrying a bounded share, and the store kept as a fallback, is the design.
Diagnose. Improve. Prove.
Diagnose
Product structure and no-cash-out proof. Players by country and state against counsel's exclusions. Store share versus web shop share of coin sales. Purchase frequency, concentration and refund policy. Dispute reasons and ratios per scheme. Current coding, pricing, reserve and terms.
Improve
Build the file so the acquirer underwrites digital goods, not gambling. Place with acquirers that have boarded the category knowingly. Set descriptors, spend limits, velocity rules and pre-dispute tools. Add pay-by-bank or wallets where card declines on repeat purchases say so. Build the second acquirer alongside the first.
Prove
Move a bounded share of coin sales to the web shop by market. Measure approval by issuer, dispute ratio, net revenue after commission and fees, and settlement timing. Expand as the data earns it; keep the store as fallback.
The social casino underwriting file.
The file that gets a social casino coded and priced as digital goods.
- Product description and terms showing no cash-out, no redemption, no prizes of value
- If the group also runs sweepstakes: separate entities, descriptors and acquiring, with a brand map
- Players by country and US state, and the exclusions enforced at registration and purchase
- Store versus web shop split of coin sales, and the migration plan
- Purchase, refund and spend-limit policy; VIP verification; velocity rules
- Six months of volume, chargeback and fraud ratios by month, by scheme and by country
- Current acquirer agreement if any: MCC, pricing, reserve, cap, exclusions
Is social casino the same as sweepstakes?
No. Social casino sells virtual coins with no cash-out: nothing the player wins can be redeemed for money or prizes. Sweepstakes runs a dual-currency model with redemption, which is a different product under state law and a different file at the acquirer. Operators that run both should keep the products, the entities and the descriptors apart so each is underwritten as what it is. Sweepstakes has its own guide: /payments/sweepstakes.
How is social casino coded?
As digital goods, not gambling. Coin purchases in a game with no cash-out fall under the digital-goods category codes (MCC 5816, digital goods: games), not MCC 7995 (betting and casino gambling). The distinction decides which acquirers will look at the file, what interchange applies and which monitoring expectations attach. An operator coded 7995 because a provider took the word casino literally is paying for a category it is not in; an operator coding sweepstakes redemption traffic as 5816 is doing the opposite and will be found.
Why is the web shop a payments problem?
Because for most of the category's history coin sales ran through Apple and Google, who were the merchant, carried the chargebacks and took the platform commission; the operator never had an acquiring relationship for its players. Since the US court rulings in May 2025 that required Apple to permit external billing, and Google's expansion of third-party billing on Android, operators have been moving coin sales to their own web shops to recover the commission. A web shop is a merchant account: the operator becomes the merchant, needs an acquirer that underwrites the category, and inherits the fraud, disputes and monitoring it never saw inside the store.
What do acquirers ask about a product with no cash-out?
Three things. Proof that there is no cash-out, in the terms, the product and the data, because that is what keeps it out of the gambling category. Where the players are, because US state exposure differs and some states are blocked by the operator's own counsel. And the purchase and refund policy, because the dispute profile of virtual goods is unlike physical goods: nothing ships, nothing is returned, and the cardholder often is not the player.
What is the US state exposure?
Washington is the reference case. In Kater v. Churchill Downs (Ninth Circuit, 2018) the court treated purchased virtual chips as a thing of value under Washington's gambling statute, and the litigation that followed produced settlements including $415 million in Benson v. DoubleDown Interactive and IGT, approved by the federal court in Seattle; plaintiffs' counsel put their social-casino settlements at $651 million in total. Operators block Washington; acquirers expect to see the block enforced at registration and purchase and ask what else counsel has excluded. This is legal context, not advice: which states to serve is for your counsel.
Why are social casino chargebacks different?
Virtual goods, high-frequency purchases, and a share of transactions on cards that belong to someone other than the player. Family fraud (a minor or a relative on the cardholder's card) and buyer's remorse on a session of purchases produce disputes with no shipment to prove and no product to return. Clear descriptors, purchase confirmations, spend limits and a refund policy that resolves before the dispute are the controls. Pre-dispute tools (alerts, rapid resolution) earn their cost here, and the ratios feed Visa's and Mastercard's monitoring like any other merchant: /problems/vamp-thresholds.
Does whale concentration matter to the acquirer?
Yes, because of the arithmetic. Social gaming revenue is concentrated: in research published by Optimove across 235 games over 18 months, the top 10% of players produced 75% of revenue, the top 5% produced 55%, and the top 1% produced 30%. A disputed high-spender account moves a monthly ratio on its own, and a high spender is also the profile most likely to hit issuer velocity limits and later to dispute. Velocity rules, spend limits and VIP verification are both a player-protection measure and the reason an acquirer can price you on history rather than on the worst month it can imagine.
How is Europe different?
The no-cash-out line does not hold everywhere. Belgium has treated paid random-reward mechanics as games of chance since 2018, with an Antwerp court in 2025 finding loot boxes bought with real money unlawful; the Netherlands treats paid random mechanics that affect play as unlawful and bars them from games aimed at children; Germany requires disclosure, a gambling warning and published odds; Spain and Austria restrict them for under-18s. Those rules were written for loot boxes, and how far they reach a casino-style game with no cash-out is a question for your counsel, country by country. At the acquirer, the questions are the same as in the US: no cash-out, where the players are, how disputes are handled, plus the usual SCA and exemption questions on high-frequency purchases.
How is Milestone paid for this?
By the acquirer or PSP you end up using, as a commission on volume. No fee to the operator for the review. We place with whichever of ~30 providers underwrites the category knowingly, so we have no reason to push one.
Sweepstakes
The dual-currency model with redemption: a different category.
VAMP thresholds
The ratio the web shop now owns, and how Visa counts it.
MCCs explained
Why 5816 and 7995 are different businesses at the acquirer.
Opening a web shop, or already running one?
Tell us the store/web split, where your players are and how disputes run today. We tell you within one business day which acquirers will underwrite the category as digital goods and what the file needs. No fee for the review.