Who we serve › CFD & forex
Card acquiring for CFD and forex brokers, especially offshore-licensed
TL;DR. For most brokers the problem is not getting an acquirer; it is getting one whose issuer coverage matches where the clients are. A broker boarded on the first acquirer that said yes reads low approval in its best markets as a feature of the vertical. It is not. It is the wrong acquirer for that corridor, sometimes the wrong MCC, sometimes fraud rules tuned for e-commerce. Offshore-licensed brokers (St Vincent, Seychelles, Mauritius, Vanuatu, Labuan, Comoros, BVI) are most of our book here; FCA, CySEC and ASIC brokers mostly manage on their own.
Who this is for. Brokers processing $100K+ a month in client deposits, on any licence, who have an approval problem in a market they care about, or need a second path before the first one changes its mind.
Issuers decide per country. Acquirers cover per country. Your clients are in several.
Coverage
An acquirer strong for EU cards can be weak for LATAM, South-East Asia or the Gulf. Approval in a market tracks the acquirer's issuer relationships there, not your licence.
Coding
MCC 6211 is declined or restricted by some issuers in some countries. Where the business and the scheme rules support it, some acquirers board brokers under 6012, which issuers accept more widely. Their call, raised in every placement.
Rules
3DS and fraud settings tuned for e-commerce decline a known client's fourth deposit. Deposit flows need their own rules.
Four failure modes we see repeatedly.
01
Boarded on whoever said yes.
The first acquirer to approve the file becomes the only acquirer. Its issuer coverage was never checked against the client map. Declines in the best markets follow, and get blamed on the vertical.
02
One rail for all markets.
Cards everywhere, including markets where clients expect local bank transfer or a regional wallet and where issuers block brokerage. Repeat deposits leak.
03
The 95% promise.
A number quoted before anyone looked at deposits by client country. In this vertical more than most, approval is set by issuer policy per market, and no acquirer can promise around it.
04
Withdrawals as an afterthought.
Deposit rails are fixed; withdrawals run on something slow. Slow withdrawals turn into deposit disputes and regulatory complaints, and the acquirer sees the ratio.
Diagnose. Improve. Prove.
Diagnose
Licence and entities. Deposits by client country, card type and issuer. Current acquirer(s), MCC, reserve and cap terms. 3DS and fraud settings on deposit flows. Withdrawal rails and timing. Which markets convert and which leak.
Improve
Match each material client market to an acquirer with coverage there, under one stack. Raise the MCC question where the business supports it. Tune deposit-flow rules for known clients. Add local methods where cards underperform. Fix withdrawals. Negotiate reserve on history.
Prove
Route one market's bounded deposits to the new path. Measure approval by issuer, dispute ratio, settlement and withdrawal timing. Expand market by market as the data earns it. Keep the incumbent until the new path has carried real traffic.
The broker underwriting file.
Every acquirer that boards brokers knowingly asks for the same things. Having them ready is the biggest single accelerator.
- Licence certificate and the entity it covers; group structure chart with UBOs
- Target-market list by deposit share, so the acquirer can be matched to it before the application
- Client agreement, risk disclosures and the products offered (CFDs, spot FX, crypto CFDs, leverage levels)
- KYC and AML programme as operated, including source-of-funds triggers
- Six months of deposit volume, chargeback and fraud ratios by month and by country
- Withdrawal process, rails and average timing
- Current acquirer agreements: MCC, reserve, cap, release schedule, exclusions
Can an offshore-licensed forex broker get card acquiring?
Yes. Brokers licensed in St Vincent, Seychelles, Mauritius, Vanuatu, Labuan, Comoros, the BVI and similar jurisdictions are most of our book in this vertical; the FCA, CySEC and ASIC brokers mostly manage on their own. The acquirer set is narrower, the underwriting questions are about target markets and ownership, and the outcome depends far more on matching the acquirer to where your clients actually are than on the licence itself.
Why is our approval rate so low on deposits?
Usually one of three things. The acquirer has no issuer coverage in your main client markets, so issuers there treat the transaction as foreign and risky. The transaction is coded as securities (MCC 6211), which some issuers decline by policy or treat like cash. Or 3DS and fraud rules are tuned for e-commerce, not for a known client making a fourth deposit. Each has a different fix; the first one is the most common and the most expensive, and it is solved by choosing the acquirer for the corridor, not the corridor for the acquirer.
MCC 6211 or 6012: does it matter?
It matters to issuers. 6211 (securities brokers and dealers) is the natural code for a brokerage and is declined or restricted by some issuers in some countries. 6012 (financial institutions, merchandise and services) is accepted more widely. Which code applies is the acquirer's decision under the scheme rules for what you actually do, and some acquirers will board a broker under 6012 where the business and the rules support it. We raise it in every placement; we do not promise it, and a code that does not match the business is a termination waiting to happen.
One acquirer for all our client markets?
Almost never, for the same reason as in crypto: acquirer appetite and issuer coverage are per jurisdiction. A broker with clients in LATAM, South-East Asia and the Gulf typically needs two or three paths routed by client country, under one stack, with local methods where cards underperform. The failure mode is boarding on whoever said yes first and then reading declines in your best market as "forex is hard".
Which payment methods convert for broker deposits?
Cards for first deposits almost everywhere. Local bank transfers, instant-payment schemes and regional wallets for repeat deposits, chosen per market from your own decline data. Crypto on-ramps where the client base expects it. Withdrawals are a separate rail and often the weaker one; slow withdrawals become deposit disputes.
What do acquirers ask an offshore broker for?
Licence and the entity it covers, group structure and UBOs, target-market list by traffic share, client agreement and risk disclosures, KYC and AML programme, six months of deposit volume with chargeback and fraud ratios by month and country, withdrawal process and timing, and current acquirer agreements. The file decides weeks versus months.
Do schemes restrict CFD and forex acquiring?
Card schemes treat brokerage and leveraged products as a higher-scrutiny category with specific registration and monitoring expectations for acquirers, which is part of why the acquirer set is narrow. The detail of what applies to your product in your markets is for your acquirer and counsel; what we do is place you with acquirers that already operate inside those rules for this category.
How is Milestone paid for this?
By the acquirer or PSP you end up using, as a commission on volume. No fee to the broker for the review. We place with whichever of ~30 providers fits your licence and markets, so we have no reason to push one.
Crypto (MCC 6051)
The same corridor logic, one MCC over.
Rolling reserve
What the reserve actually locks, and what to negotiate.
True-cost calculator
What a few points of approval are worth against the fee.
Send us deposits by country.
Licence, client markets by share, current acquirer and MCC, and where the declines are. We reply within one business day. No fee for the review.