Who we serve › iGaming › MGA
Card acquiring for MGA-licensed iGaming operators
TL;DR. An MGA licence opens the widest set of EU acquirers and the lowest reserves in iGaming. It does not decide the outcome. Acquirers board a licensed entity for a set of markets, and the MGA licence covers fewer of them than most operators assume: every locally-regulated EU market needs its own licence, and acquirers check traffic by country against it. The more common MGA problem is comfort: a first acquirer that was easy, terms set on day one, and nothing else built because nothing broke. We place MGA operators with more providers than any other licence, and most of the work is choosing between them.
Who this is for. MGA-licensed operators processing $100K+ a month in deposits who want a second acquirer, a reserve priced on today's history, better approval in a specific market, or a clean separation between the MGA entity and other licences in the group.
The longest list in the category. Still a list.
Acquirers
The widest set in iGaming: EU acquirers that board the category knowingly treat an MGA B2C licence as the reference document. Long enough that the question is which two to run, not whether one will say yes.
Markets
EU-facing traffic from markets without a local regime. Markets that license locally (Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, France, the Nordics and others) need that licence on a separate entity, and acquirers check traffic by country against it.
Risk measures
The lowest reserves in the category on clean history: low single digits, often capped, sometimes none after a track record. If you still carry 10% uncapped, those are onboarding terms that nobody revisited. What a reserve costs →
General patterns, not rules: individual acquirers are more flexible than the category suggests, which is exactly what we know and they do not advertise. Licensing advice is for your regulatory counsel.
Two ways a tier-one operator ends up exposed. Neither is the licence.
01
One acquirer, because the first one was easy.
Tier-one paper gets boarded fast, so nobody builds the second path. Years later the acquirer's appetite for the category changes on its own calendar, and there is nowhere to route deposits. The first 72 hours →
02
Terms from year one.
Reserve, cap, pricing and exclusions set when the operator was new, never renegotiated, because the relationship was fine. A second quote is what moves them; an established MGA operator with clean history is the easiest case we have.
Diagnose. Improve. Prove.
Diagnose
Licences and the entity each covers, traffic by country against them, current acquirer terms (reserve, cap, exclusions, change rights), deposit approval by market and issuer, withdrawal timing, dispute and fraud ratios, the acquirer's own VAMP standing.
Improve
Add the acquirer whose market list and pricing fit today's history, not year one's. Route by market. Separate entities and brands on paper before the file goes in. Renegotiate the incumbent with the second quote in hand.
Prove
Move a bounded share of deposits, by market. Measure approval by issuer, dispute ratio, settlement timing and withdrawal success. Expand as the data earns it; keep the incumbent until the second path has carried real traffic.
The MGA underwriting file.
Shorter than for an offshore licence. Everything on the iGaming list, with these four done properly.
- MGA licence certificate and the game types it covers, plus any local licences held by other group entities
- Traffic by country for six months, mapped to the licence that covers each market
- Structure chart and brand map if the group holds more than one licence
- Six months of deposit volume, chargeback and fraud ratios by month and by country
- Current acquirer agreements: reserve, cap, release schedule, exclusions, change rights
- AML / KYC and responsible-gambling programme as actually operated
Does an MGA licence guarantee card acquiring?
No, but it is the licence most acquirers prefer to see. It opens the widest set of EU acquirers and the lowest reserves in the category, and it shortens the file. Every acquirer still underwrites the operator: ownership, markets, chargeback and fraud history, AML programme, and above all whether the traffic matches what the licence covers. We place MGA operators with more providers than any other licence, and the difference between them is still large.
Which markets does an MGA licence cover at the acquirer?
The licence is issued under Malta's Gaming Act (2018) and is the reference document for an EU-facing operator. It does not license you in markets that run their own regime: Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, France, Sweden, Denmark and others require a local licence, and acquirers check your traffic by country against that.
What reserve should an MGA operator expect?
The lowest in the category on clean history: low single digits rolling, often with a cap, and sometimes none at all after a track record. If you are an established MGA operator still paying a 10% uncapped reserve, those are terms from the day you were boarded and nobody has revisited them. They come down fastest when the acquirer knows a second provider has quoted you.
We have had the same acquirer for years. Why add a second one?
Because the acquirer's appetite for the category, not your performance, decides whether the account survives, and that changes on the acquirer's calendar. Established MGA operators are the ones most often caught with everything on one provider, because the first relationship was easy and nothing broke. A second acquirer already carrying a share of deposits is the only protection that works on the day the letter arrives.
Which payment methods matter for MGA traffic?
Cards are a share, not the whole. In most EU markets the deposit mix includes instant bank transfer and open-banking methods, vouchers and wallets, with the mix differing by country. Approval by issuer and withdrawal speed matter more to players than the method list. We add methods where deposits fail in the data, not where a catalogue says.
Does VAMP affect MGA operators differently?
The thresholds are the same for everyone; the exposure is not. A tier-one operator with low chargebacks can still be identified if the acquirer's own portfolio is flagged, which pulls the merchant bar down to 0.5%. Ask the acquirer where it stands before you sign. Full guide: /problems/vamp-thresholds.
Should we also hold a Curaçao or Anjouan licence for other markets?
That is a regulatory and commercial decision for your counsel. At the acquirer, the two licences do different jobs: MGA for EU-facing traffic on the widest list; an offshore licence, with the right acquirer and a defined target-market list, for markets the MGA entity should not be taking. Many operators run both, on separate entities and separate stacks, and the acquirer must see which entity takes which market.
How is Milestone paid for this?
By the acquirer or PSP you end up using, as a commission on volume. No fee to the operator for the review. We place with whichever of ~30 providers fits your markets and history, so we have no reason to push one.
iGaming by license
MGA, UKGC, Curaçao, Anjouan and US state licences compared at the acquirer.
Curaçao-licensed operators
For the markets the MGA entity should not be taking.
VAMP thresholds
Why your acquirer's standing matters even with clean ratios.
Tell us your markets and current acquirer terms.
We reply within one business day with whether the terms are a price or a template, and which acquirers would quote against them. No fee for the review.